
Many other papers have football on the front page, as we move toward the Super Bowl.
Our Front Pages will look at the choices newspaper editors make for their photos of various candidates (mostly presidential candidates). Newspapers have many choices to make when they choose to run photos of candidates, especially on front pages. We will look at those choices and how they may influence readers.

Many other papers have football on the front page, as we move toward the Super Bowl.

But have a look at the cover of USA Today this morning:
In a way this is a much warmer picture of Hillary. Her smile appears really genuine, the photo is closely cropped so she's not seen in relation to a crowd, but the viewer looks only and directly at her face. The image of McCain (to the left of Hillary) shows him waving, in an image that somewhat obscures his face and gives the sense also of a slight pushing away from the viewer.
And the next venue of battle is South Carolina. Have a look at The Herald. Could they have chosen a less flattering photo of Hillary Clinton, while the small picture of Romney looks like he's conceding:





Question #1 - Where's Obama? He's in there, his head turned away from the camera, and standing in the back. You'd miss him if you blinked.
Question #2 - Is Hillary unpopular? Her face, also, is away from the camera. She doesn't appear to be talking to anyone, although it's possible McCain is acknowledging her.
Question #3 - Does it appear that the candidates are all gathered around John Edwards, congratulating him? That's how it looks to me.
I know nothing about the politics of this newspaper, but from this full color, above-the-fold, front page photo, it sure looks like they love Edwards. With the New Hampshire primary only two days away, it'll be interesting to see how Edwards does.